Frame an AI Product Opportunity
Decide whether AI belongs in a workflow by starting with user decisions, a non-AI baseline, value, feasibility, and unacceptable outcomes.
Learning objectives
- Define a user outcome without assuming AI is the solution
- Compare an AI concept with a credible non-AI baseline
- Write measurable pilot and stop criteria
ToolDix original visual
Frame
Name the outcome and constraints.
Build
Try one bounded workflow.
Review
Keep evidence, revise, and share.
Describe the current work
Map the trigger, people, information, decision, action, delay, and failure cost in the existing workflow. Interview the person who performs and the person affected by the work. Do not begin with “we need a chatbot.” Begin with a friction or decision that can be observed.
Write at least one non-AI alternative: better search, clearer rules, form redesign, automation, training, or an additional human review step. AI must earn its additional uncertainty and operating cost.
Choose the role of AI
Decide whether the system drafts, classifies, retrieves, recommends, predicts, transforms, or acts. Specify the human responsibility around that output. Drafting a support reply and sending one are different products with different evidence and risk requirements.
List required data, permissions, freshness, integration points, latency, cost, and expected failure modes. If you cannot obtain representative data or evaluate quality, the concept is not ready for a model comparison.
Define value and boundaries
Use task metrics such as correction rate, completion time, resolution quality, review burden, adoption, and harmful-error rate. Include an unacceptable outcome and a stop condition. “Users like it” is not enough.
Practice: one-page opportunity brief
Write: user and job, current workflow, pain evidence, non-AI baseline, proposed AI role, human handoff, required data, quality metric, business metric, risk metric, pilot group, and stop condition. Ask a skeptical domain expert to identify assumptions.
Decision
Proceed only when a small pilot can generate trustworthy evidence without exposing users to irreversible or poorly understood harm.
Sources and license context
These references informed the lesson. ToolDix adds its own explanation, workflow, and practice rather than reproducing source material.
- Machine Learning Problem Framing (Google site terms apply)
- People + AI Guidebook (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Take it further
Use a primary source to deepen this lesson.
Each recommendation is a direct link to the publisher or author. The study prompt is ToolDix editorial guidance, not copied course content.

Course
People + AI Guidebook
Choose one product concept and complete the user-needs and mental-model exercises before choosing a model.
Open original source
Hands-on lab
Build Trusted AI Products with PAIR
Bring one real product idea and complete the trust-calibration exercise with at least one non-technical reviewer.
Open original source
Course
Transform Your Business with AI
Name one business metric, one workflow owner, and one unacceptable outcome before funding a pilot.
Open original source